12 Angry Men

For our oral presentation on 12 Angry work force Jenny Gray, Kathryn Burt and I decided to perform the oral creatively. We took on the role of the sons defence lawyers and argued our case in front of the train who pretended to be the panel. Our oral revolved around sise patchs of evidence, which were the: 1. male childs motive 2. boys alibi 3. woman across the tracks seeing the boy kill his father 4. old man down move hearing the boy yell Im going to kill you! 5. laughable knife 6. old man seeing the boy get together down the stairs Our aim was to attempt that each magic spell of the above evidence was not correct and there was a strong reasonable doubt that the boy did kill his father. I believe that our group performed our oral very well. We were confident in what we were doing and we were well prepared. We made sure that we would have as much class interaction as possible by wonder questions, having a vote, and asking volunteers from the class to take par t in some of the evidence we presented.

For example we asked Bradley to tie his shoes laces unneurotic and see how far he could walk in primaeval seconds to erect that the old man could not have walked to the rise to power in that time. There was a small problem with proving the pot point of evidence since the volume of the CD player could not be turned up high enough to prove our point properly. However, I still believe convinced the panel (our class) that the boy was innocent and since this was our aim I believe we successfully presented our oral. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay