Raskolnikovs Nature

detestation and PunishmentIntroductionThe unfermented Crime and Punishment leans heavily on Aristotelian thought and shares with Aristotle a commitment to not adjudge some determinate aim discipline the locus of genuine motive . The general trend in much modern clean-living theory has been to take certain fixed beliefs and determine to be prior to moral behavior , and to conceive of these as existence the particular case on which our honourable worry should concentrate Aristotle s philosophy towards Raskolnikov s character in the novel do an feat to make the same point that the development of the moral egotism is prior to any ethical content and so should be the focal point of ethical inquiryPhilosophy towards the NovelThe protagonist of Dostoevsky s novel , Raskolnikov , major power be cited by the objector reg arding nonsensical as an instance of a person who is committed to the superlative overall profound and to relieving the deserving poor of their suffering , save who , in responding with evil and killing the pawnbroker , appears as ignorant or misguided well-nigh what he is conscientiously doing . Raskolnikov is portrayed as a well-intentioned person who , had he not devoted him ego up to the politics , might realise create up the feelings of egotism-worth that accompany roll in the hay of ego while (the objector points bring out ) responding to others with evilYet what we have illustrated in Raskolnikov is precisely what we should find worrying about some(prenominal) modern ethical theories : a person s belief in or commitment to a secular conception of the ethical as given by some particular content , with an sequential neglect of the self (the subject of moral understanding . Raskolnikov looks to theory to find out how to behave , and engages in a perform neglec t of his proclaim self as a possible locus! of the ethical . Through this characterization , Dostoevsky signals what he saying as a danger inherent in many ethical theories : the preoccupation with objective content .

The objector to my line assuming that good and evil are given by an objective content , regards Raskolnikov s killing the pawnbroker as the objective content on which a theorist s ethical attention should heighten . The killing is seen as evil and she questions whether my account of love of self is able to boot out evil : evil being unsounded in term of some objective content such as harming , theft or killingWere we to share this supposition regarding objectiv e content , and were we to reverse it to an account of moral understanding , we would have moral subjects who would thusly be open to evil in a demeanor that no moral subjects can spend to be . moreover , were we to engage in such a transposition , we would not be able to understand Dostoevsky s passage of Sonia in Crime and Punishment , or what it was about the execute of the pawnbroker that bothered her so . While Sonia was bothered by the seediness of the murder , the contract of her attention was not on this fact : the killing , as objective content , was not her key worry Her fundamental...If you deficiency to get a full essay, align it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay