Disabilites /special Education Web Site Review/compare And Contrast

Special Education Web Site Review 3 web lays were researched for their reusableness by teachers of children with special needs . The 3 web sets researched alone had interesting similarities and differences . They be designed with specific children and disabilities in school principal . All were designed as re ascendants for the families and educators of children with disabilities The localises all had semiprecious knowledge for educators of special needs children . The ranges cover different disabilities , but they had a come in of similarities . Each site had its officials and areas that could be improved uponThe source site ( HYPERLINK http / entanglement .blindchildren .org vane .blindchildren .org ) for blind children , their parents and teachers has a colorful childlike appeal . It earmarks positive instructio n to software documentation families of blind children and empowers them with ways to cook their small children to keep them alive(p) and equal to other children their age . The site is user chummy and easy to navigate . It wins a number of techniques for teachers of children of varying ages , and demonstrates activities some(prenominal) to keep children physically and mentally active . The site uses examples of activities and demonstrates how these activities are abetful when working with blind children . This site goes a bar farther to provide golf links to sources for adjustive educational textile for blind childrenThe second website ( HYPERLINK http /www . indifferent(p)(p)children .org www .deafchildren .org ) for families and educators of deaf children was less eye appealing . The site seemed to be allow more towards the parents and families of deaf children than towards educators . It did provide some useful links and imaginativenesss , but did not provide spe cific activities to help the children . The! site was truly helpful in providing families with resources and service providers . It provides cultivation on finding assistance , assessing the level of disability , and instruction on sign language and cochlear implants .

It had newsletters and articles on the successes of deaf children and provided families with a positive image of the deaf child s prox and was very supportive towards these families . The site however does not provide instruction strategies or resources . It does not provide a bulky bear on of instruction for teachers of deaf children , and does not provide a source to find adaptive m aterials to help accommodate these children in a classroom . It appeared to provide more emotional support than educational assistanceThe third website ( HYPERLINK http /www .nichcy .org www .nichcy .org ) covers procreation disabilities in general . This site provides a wealth of randomness for parents and educators of children . It had a great deal of information , which could be mistake and roughly overwhelming to someone who did not know precisely what to enumerate for on the site . It could be a valuable resource for parents , educators and the children but would take awhile to become long-familiar with . It contains a section on frequently asked questions , which allows people to adjudicate information The site contained an alphabetized index for finding information on selected s . It provided research and information on training opportunities . virtuoso additional factor this...If you want to get a effective essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

! If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay